Every winter, the same stories surface. Tenants reporting condensation streaming down windows. Asset managers fielding urgent calls about heating failures. Housing officers bracing for the annual surge in damp and mould complaints. Maintenance teams stretched thin as temperatures plummet.

It's not that we didn't see it coming. Winter arrives on schedule every year. Yet when it does, it has a way of revealing uncomfortable truths that data dashboards and compliance reports can obscure for months at a time.

When the temperature drops, homes are tested in ways no inspection regime can replicate. Heating systems that looked adequate on paper prove inadequate in practice. Insulation assumptions collide with reality. Energy costs spike, and for many households, home becomes less a place of comfort than a source of anxiety.

At Christmas, this feels particularly acute. A season culturally associated with warmth and shelter collides with the stark reality that for hundreds of thousands of UK households, warmth is conditional, rationed, or simply unaffordable.

The scale of the problem

The numbers are sobering. Nearly 9.6 million UK households live in poorly insulated homes with incomes below the minimum required for an acceptable standard of living, according to research from UCL's Institute of Health Equity. Around 3.2 million households in 2023-24 reported being unable to keep warm during winter, per the latest English Housing Survey.

The human cost is stark. Approximately 4,950 excess winter deaths in 2022/23 were attributed to cold homes, based on official data analysed by the End Fuel Poverty Coalition. This isn't about extreme weather events or unpredictable crises—it's about the everyday failure of housing to do what housing should do: provide warmth and safety.

Cold homes double the risk of adults developing new mental health conditions and put one in four children at risk of multiple mental health symptoms. The impact on children is particularly concerning: respiratory problems, missed school days, impaired development. As one paediatric lung consultant noted in the research, babies in cold homes spend their calories trying not to die of hypothermia rather than developing crucial lung tissue and neural pathways.

For social housing professionals, these aren't abstract statistics. They're residents you know by name. They're repair orders that keep coming back. They're the gap between what the data says should work and what tenants experience in practice.

Cold homes are not a weather problem

It's tempting to frame winter discomfort as an unfortunate byproduct of British weather. It's not. Cold homes are the cumulative result of decades of decisions about insulation standards, ventilation strategies, heating system design, maintenance prioritisation, and investment timing.

The UK housing stock is among the oldest and least energy-efficient in Europe. Much of our social housing was built when fuel was cheap, expectations were lower, and thermal performance was poorly understood. Even where improvements have been made, they're often partial: a new boiler without improved insulation, new windows without proper ventilation, EPC-driven upgrades that look strong on paper but feel weak when temperatures drop below freezing.

Winter doesn't create cold homes. It exposes them.

The compliance-comfort gap

Here's the uncomfortable reality many of us in the sector face: homes that struggle most in winter are often technically compliant.

They have valid gas safety certificates. Their EPC ratings satisfy regulatory thresholds. Repairs have been logged, inspected, and closed. On paper, everything checks out. Yet residents still report rooms that never properly warm up, persistent condensation, mould returning year after year, and heating systems that are theoretically adequate but practically unaffordable to run.

This is the gap between regulatory compliance and lived experience. From a professional perspective, we can point to standards met, processes followed, data recorded. From a tenant's perspective, none of that matters if their child is sleeping in a room they can see their breath in.

Awaab's Law, which came into force in October 2025, now requires social landlords to investigate damp and mould within 10 working days and make properties safe within five working days. Emergency hazards must be addressed within 24 hours. These are vital reforms, a lasting legacy to two-year-old Awaab Ishak, who died after prolonged exposure to mould in his Rochdale home.

But legislation setting response timeframes, crucial as it is, doesn't solve the underlying problem: homes designed and built in ways that make damp and mould predictable rather than surprising when winter arrives.

When data doesn't match reality

Asset data often looks robust in aggregate. Stock condition surveys project lifecycle assumptions. EPCs provide ratings. Planned programmes appear logical and well-sequenced. Then winter arrives, and that data gets stress-tested in ways that reveal where it falls short.

Cold weather exposes where insulation performance is overstated, where ventilation assumptions don't hold, where heating systems are theoretically adequate but practically ineffective, and where "within lifecycle" doesn't mean "fit for purpose."

According to the 2019 English House Condition Survey, 44% of social housing dwellings in England and Wales had an energy efficiency rating below EPC C. Many housing associations have been working to close that gap, from 2012 to 2022, housing associations improved the proportion of stock with an EPC rating of C or better from 40% to 72%. That's significant progress.

But EPCs were never designed to capture comfort, moisture behaviour, or how residents actually use their homes. A property can score reasonably well on an EPC and still perform poorly when it's genuinely cold outside. The risk is that we end up believing the data more than the resident—until winter proves the resident right.

Damp and mould: predictable, not mysterious

The sector understands far more about damp and mould than we did even five years ago. We know the science: cold surfaces plus high humidity plus inadequate airflow equals condensation. Where insulation, heating, and ventilation are misaligned, mould isn't a surprise. It's an outcome.

Yet too often, responses remain reactive rather than preventative. Washing down mould. Repainting. Advising residents on heating behaviour or ventilation. Temporary fixes that last until the next cold snap.

Awaab's Law guidance is explicit that social landlords should not assume the cause of damp and mould is due to tenant 'lifestyle'. Everyday activities like cooking, bathing, and drying laundry inevitably produce moisture. These are not lifestyle choices, they're unavoidable aspects of living in a home.

Winter exposes whether our services are genuinely preventative or still fundamentally reactive. Are we resolving causes or just managing symptoms?

Energy affordability and housing quality are inseparable

A home that's technically heatable but unaffordable to heat is, in practice, a cold home. Rising energy prices have moved this from a marginal concern to a central one.

Many tenants now self-ration heat: heating only one room, running systems for short periods, avoiding use altogether during milder spells to save money for when it's truly freezing. This behaviour is entirely rational given financial pressures. It's also precisely the behaviour that increases the risk of damp, mould, and associated health impacts.

For housing providers, this means asset management, income collection, and resident wellbeing are no longer separate workstreams. They intersect most visibly in the coldest months of the year, when a resident's decision about whether to heat their home becomes a calculation balancing financial survival against physical comfort and health.

The sector has made progress, social rented homes had the highest median energy efficiency score among tenure types at 70 in England and 72 in Wales, compared to 67 and 65 for private rentals. But median scores mask wide variation. For the households living in the lower-performing properties, statistics about sector averages offer little comfort.

What winter asks of us

Winter asks a straightforward but difficult question: are our homes designed and managed for real conditions, or for regulatory sufficiency?

It challenges us to look beyond minimum standards and consider whether our investment models prioritise lived performance. Whether our data systems capture risk early enough. Whether our repairs services resolve causes rather than symptoms. Whether we treat warmth as a core service rather than a seasonal issue.

Good housing isn't proven in summer. It's proven on the coldest nights, when systems are under maximum strain and residents rely on them most.

This isn't about pointing fingers or assigning blame. Most of the challenges we face, aging stock, legacy design decisions, constrained budgets, competing demands—are structural issues that no individual landlord created. But they remain our collective responsibility to address.

Looking ahead

The good news is that the sector is moving. Housing associations and local authorities are increasingly implementing retrofit strategies that go beyond basic energy efficiency to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and integrate renewable energy sources. Heat pumps, solar panels, improved ventilation systems, and fabric-first approaches are becoming more common.

Awaab's Law provides a framework for accountability that didn't exist before. The focus on damp and mould as a health risk rather than a maintenance irritation represents a fundamental shift in how the sector approaches these issues.

But we need to be honest: as things stand, approximately 1.2 million social homes still had an EPC rating below C as of 2022. Many landlords are working toward targets of EPC C by 2030 or 2035. That's several winters away. For residents living in those homes right now, the timeline matters.

Christmas and the human dimension

At Christmas, cold housing feels different. The cultural expectation of warmth is heightened. When a home is cold in December, it affects not just physical comfort but how people use space, whether they can host family, how they feel about their own living situation and dignity.

This isn't sentimentality. It's recognition that housing quality is experienced emotionally and socially, not just technically. Cold homes isolate people precisely when connection matters most. They force impossible choices between heating and eating, between comfort and financial security.

For housing professionals, winter is when the gap between intentions and outcomes becomes most visible. It's when residents who've been patient or understanding for months finally reach out, often in crisis. It's when we see most clearly whether our systems are built to respond to need or to process.

The work ahead

If we want fewer crises next winter and the winter after that, the work doesn't start in December. It starts now, in how we approach asset data, how we prioritise investment, how we design maintenance programmes, and how seriously we take comfort as a measure of housing quality.

Some questions worth asking:

• Do our stock condition surveys capture actual performance in cold weather, or just component age and theoretical standards?

• Are our heating systems designed for the cheapest running costs in use, or just the lowest capital cost to install?

• When we upgrade elements of a property, do we consider the whole system—insulation, ventilation, heating together or optimise elements in isolation?

• Do our asset management strategies anticipate winter demand, or react to it?

• Are we learning from winter performance to inform our long-term investment plans?

These aren't rhetorical questions. They're practical ones with operational implications. The answers determine whether winter reveals problems we were already addressing, or problems we didn't know existed.

Warmth as a fundamental expectation

Cold homes are not inevitable. They're the result of choices, about design, data, maintenance, investment priorities, and what we accept as "good enough."

Christmas doesn't create these problems. It simply makes them harder to look away from. Harder to justify. Harder to defer.

The challenge for the sector is to carry that clarity beyond winter. To treat warmth not as a seasonal issue but as a fundamental expectation of decent housing. To close the gap between compliance and comfort, between what data suggests and what residents experience.

Housing professionals work in a world of constraints budgets, regulations, competing priorities, legacy stock. But residents live in homes. And in those homes, on the coldest nights, what matters isn't whether standards were met. It's whether the heating works, whether the house stays warm, whether they can afford to use it, and whether their children are safe and comfortable.

That's the measure that matters. That's what winter exposes. And that's what we need to design for, invest in, and hold ourselves accountable to not just in December, but every month of the year.

_{Articles to Dwell On}